Product Management, Strategy

How to Conduct a Product Opportunity Assessment

Opportunity

Product teams exist to assess opportunity and capitalize.

Product managers are tasked with finding market problems that are urgent, pervasive within a certain target market, and that people are willing to pay to remedy.  Then, once found, product owners guide the development of a profitable solution to those problems. (at smaller organizations, those may be the same person)

Market problems can be solved with new service offerings; new features; new partnerships; or new products.  Given limited resources, however, product teams can’t pursue every opportunity.  They must prioritize.

In traditional corporate environments, teams conducted extensive research prior to starting a product effort.  The business case served to document the context, rationale and revenue potential (to be covered in a future blog post) of a business opportunity.

Over time, it’s been proven that this snapshot of the world is out of date as soon as it’s “completed,” is usually incomplete, and entrenches the expected solution such that pivoting based on market response becomes difficult.  Because of this, many teams are now moving to a more concise opportunity assessment.

Three Approaches to Product Opportunity Assessment

The more significant the investment needed to develop a proposed solution, the more detailed the assessment should be.

In order to invest in only the most promising opportunities, it pays to start working through the sequence of assessment techniques until you’re comfortable with your decision. The bigger the opportunity, the more thorough the technique, generally speaking:

  1. Scoring (most applicable for features in an existing product)
  2. Opportunity Assessment (big features or small products)
  3. Prototype / Minimum Viable Product (full size products)

1) Scoring

The quickest assessment technique is to evaluate your idea according to a weighted scoring formula built into an easy-to-access spreadsheet.   This tactic allows ideas to be quickly ranked against each other.

This is often enough when ranking enhancements to existing products.

My friend Jason Brett has shared the “60 Second Business Case,” which illustrates this approach very well:

Jason’s approach maps to an existing customer base and product in market, supporting operational necessities as well as thresholds for scoring projected revenue impact.  The headings can be modified to apply the evaluation technique to the needs of any product organization.

Scoring opportunities allows a team to quickly focus on ideas worth pursuing, and to filter the rest out.

2) Opportunity Assessment

For ideas that past the first screen, and for those ideas suggesting larger features or a new product altogether, a slightly more involved opportunity assessment may be warranted.  Marty Cagan suggests that answers to the following ten questions should comprise the assessment of a product opportunity:

1. Exactly what problem will this solve? (value proposition)
2. For whom do we solve that problem? (target market) / (user and buyer personas)
3. How big is the opportunity? (market size)
4. What alternatives are out there? (competitive landscape)
5. Why are we best suited to pursue this? (our differentiator) / (Do we need to partner?)
6. Why now? (market window)
7. How will we get this product to market? (go-to-market strategy)
8. How will we measure success/make money from this product? (metrics/revenue strategy)
9. What factors are critical to success? (solution requirements)
10. Given the above, what’s the recommendation? (go or no-go)

I advocate completing a business model canvas or product canvas as part of assessing the opportunity as well, and considering the business strategy stalwart, the SWOT.  The important elements to include here are:

  1. Solution – To elaborate on solution requirements, the Lean Product Canvas includes a short description of the solution itself to keep everyone on the same page. 
  2. Weaknesses – A standard prompt from the SWOT: What things that we aren’t good at should we consider?
  3. Threats – This one might overlap part of Porter’s 5 forces:  Is this an easy market for others to enter?
RELATED:  The Strategy Canvas

In some cases, to clearly communicate the product idea being considered, a rough sketch of the solution is useful.  A visual illustration of the product concept in wireframes, along with a list of key workflows, can ensure meeting of the minds.  This is particularly important when this assessment is to be shared within a team.

3) Prototype / MVP

The Lean Startup movement advocates market testing a proposed product idea at a very early stage, learning from that market testing, and then adapting based on the learnings.  For product concepts that address unsolved problems in new markets, this is another tangible step on the road toward commercialization.

Some questions–such as how much someone will pay, and whether a product workflow matches actual business process–may not be truly answerable until a potential customer can evaluate a prototype in their own hands.  That prototype may be a minimum viable product.

Use the opportunity assessment to try to prove that a given market problem does NOT provide a viable opportunity.  There could be many reasons, including:

  • Perhaps there isn’t a big enough market segment
  • Perhaps the opportunity doesn’t offer enough revenue potential
  • Perhaps the opportunity does not line up with your organization’s strengths/strategy.

In any case, it may not make sense to build an MVP; or it may make sense to revise the proposal (pivot) before building anything.  If, instead, your results suggest there may be something there, you have one or more hypotheses to test with an MVP!

 Conclusion / Rule of Thumb

Do as much due diligence as is appropriate for the investment you’re considering.  A quick check of the wind direction might be enough to validate your decision to prioritize features of a product already in market.  For a new product opportunity, you’ll want to conduct a more thorough opportunity assessment, in case there are reasons you shouldn’t go forward to the prototype / MVP stage….that will allow you to invest instead in a more promising idea.

Image source: Flickr

3 Comments

  1. Pradeep Nair

    Some questions please to your rule of thumb, Would it be feasible to understand investment scope without knowing the market opportunity
    Is there a difference between market opportunity and product opportunity?
    and which is foremost?

  2. In my opinion, a competitive mindshare map should drive the assessment of market opportunity. If you can’t find territory you can capture, occupy, and defend in the minds of prospects, you probably have no opportunity.

  3. ttorres

    I particularly like your rule of thumb: “Do as much due diligence as is appropriate for the investment you’re considering.”

    I think it’s really easy to follow the rules and do too much due diligence. Sometimes just trying it out is the best path forward.

    Of course, it can be a slippery slope to never doing any due diligence. I really like the way you framed it in the context of the investment itself.

Leave a Reply

Theme by Anders Norén

%d bloggers like this:
Read previous post:
8591351239_24bcb987df_b
The User Story Map for Backlog Visualization

Perspective It's hard for a product owner to keep perspective when looking at a stacked list of features needed in...

Close